Perencanaan Struktur dan Pola Ruang Kawasan Pemerintahan Tobadak berbasis Konsep Urban Resilience

Authors

  • Muhammad Irfan Departement Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Sri Wahyuni Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Iqbal Kamaruddin Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/peweka.v4i1.52

Keywords:

Government area, Space Syntax, Urban Resilience, Sustainable, Integrated Development

Abstract

Central Mamuju Regency is currently aggressively carrying out sustainable regional development. The development aims at equitable distribution in the economic, social and environmental fields. As with developments in developing regions, the very rapid penetration of development always creates an urban paradox which in this case triggers a process of urbanization of the population from rural areas to cities. This planning aims to create a space capable of meeting and controlling the needs of the Tobadak Government Area both economically, socially and environmentally. The analysis techniques used include: SWOT analysis, AHP analysis, Spatial analysis and Space Syntax analysis. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained from government agencies as well as observation, documentation and interviews. The main results of this planning are the master plan, spatial structure and pattern planning as well as regional disaster mitigation based on the concept of sustainable and integrated development.

References

Brugmann, J. (2012). Financing the resilient city. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812437130

Brunetta, G., & Baglione, V. (2013). Resilience in the Transition Towns Movement: Towards a new urban governance. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 6, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/1524

Brunetta, G., & Caldarice, O. (2018). Putting resilience into practice: The spatial planning response to urban risks. In G. L. Choguill (Ed.), Resilient cities (pp. 39–55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_3

Coaffee, J., & O’Hare, P. (2008a). Urban resilience: Towards a framework for planning for climate change. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 1(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463130802653239

Coaffee, J., & O’Hare, P. (2008b). Urban resilience and national security: The role for planning. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning, 161(4), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2008.161.4.173

Ernstson, H. (2013). The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005

Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.

Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029

Jayawardena, H., Van Roon, M., & Knight-Lenihan, S. (2014). Resilience planning: An innovative approach in dealing with urban vulnerabilities and adaptation to prioritise opportunities for uncertain urban futures. Proceedings of the World Sustainable Building Conference SB14, Barcelona.

Lu, P.-W. (2014). Spatial planning and urban resilience in the context of flood risk: A comparative study of Kaohsiung, Tainan and Rotterdam [Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. Architecture and the Built Environment.

Mehmood, A. (2016). Of resilient places: Planning for urban resilience. European Planning Studies, 24(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980

Magoni, M. (2017). Resilience thinking and urban metabolism in spatial planning: Which possible integrations. City Territory and Architecture, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-017-0066-6

Ribeiro, P. J. G., & Gonçalves, L. A. P. J. (2019). Urban resilience: A conceptual framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625

Teklenburg, J. A., van Nes, A., & Rofaiel, M. (1993). Measures of centrality and safety in urban space. In Proceedings of the Third International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 1–15). Georgia Institute of Technology.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-27

How to Cite

Irfan, M., Wahyuni, S., & Iqbal Kamaruddin. (2025). Perencanaan Struktur dan Pola Ruang Kawasan Pemerintahan Tobadak berbasis Konsep Urban Resilience. Jurnal Peweka Tadulako, 4(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.22487/peweka.v4i1.52