• Introduction: State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background to explain the purpose and context, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results. Provide a section that identifies how the work of the study relates to previous research studies and literature. This might be shown as a separate section or as part of the introduction or methodology, depending on the nature of the study. It is important to demonstrate the contribution made by the study to future studies' knowledge and, hence, the way in which it builds on or adds to previous work on the particular topic. In the case of Experimental Futures," the approach will depend on how changes in practice represented in the paper are conceptualized. The background literature can provide a basis for the conceptualization, for example, social structure, work, human experiences, socio-technological trends, design thinking, etc. In short communications, reference to previous research should be used to support the claims being made in the paper.
• Method: Explain the conceptual basis of the research study, essay, or review and how it fits with the research questions and objectives of the study. Show how the methods used relate to this and what was done to generate new knowledge in a rigorous way. In the case of Experimental Futures, describe and explain the practices identified and how these practices are created (for instance, what is done, what technologies are used, what eco-system is involved). Explain how the practices have been sustained over time and have evolved from an idea or design to a practice. Make clear what is distinctive and 'new' about these practices. The tone of the paper should be critical reasoning and not advocacy.
• Results and Discussion: Results of future research or foresight studies should be clear and concise. This should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Demonstrate how the work reported in the paper, essay, or review contributes new knowledge. Show how the work links with existing literature, including future studies literature, avoiding over-elaborate citations. With regard to Experimental Futures, the discussion should explore the significance of the case. Typical questions might include: Why is it important? What alternative futures are envisaged or imagined from this case? What trends in societies might be driven or altered by it? What unintended consequences might be identified at this stage?
• Conclusion: A brief explanation of the significance and implications of the work reported.
• Acknowledgments: Collate acknowledgments in a separate section at the end of the article before the references and do not, therefore, include them on the title page as a footnote to the title or otherwise. List here those individuals who provided help during the research (e.g., providing language help, writing assistance proofreading the article, etc.). Any individuals who contributed to the manuscript but did not meet the authorship's necessary criteria should be acknowledged. Acknowledgments should be limited to those who helped extensively, such as providing statistical help, essential equipment, or translating references.
• References. Expect a minimum of 30 references, primarily with a minimum of 80% to journal papers, and choose IEEE style. Please don't use unpredictable website sources. The use of DOI is highly encouraged.

Please contact info pewekatadulako@gmail.com for the problems.